Invisible Emissions: Designing or Damaging the World’s Interface?
- Mahek Shaikh

- 1 day ago
- 3 min read
We have all heard about emissions from flights, trains, gyms, and factories — but have you ever wondered if there are emissions not visible to the naked eye? Emissions that don’t rise from airplane engines, leaving a trail in the sky for us to notice, but exist quietly in the background of our everyday lives.
These are what we call invisible emissions — the carbon emissions generated by our digital world. Every website we visit, every image we upload, and every graphic we design relies on energy-run data centers to function. These data centers run nonstop, using massive amounts of energy to process data and keep systems cool. The information then travels through networks, cables, and cloud infrastructure — each step consuming electricity and, when powered by fossil fuels, producing carbon emissions. The heavier the digital content, the higher the impact. High-resolution images, videos, animations, and unoptimized websites require more data transfer and server activity, increasing energy use. While a single click may seem insignificant, millions of users interacting with digital platforms every day turn these invisible emissions into a very real environmental footprint. Unlike traditional emissions, these don’t come with a warning, but are very real.
The global digital sector — including data centers, networks, and personal devices — is responsible for roughly 3–4% of global greenhouse gas emissions, a footprint comparable to the aviation industry. For one person, this might feel small but by a ballpark estimate, an average person’s yearly digital activity (emails, scrolling social media, streaming, cloud storage) produces roughly the same emissions as taking 1–2 short flights within Europe, such as Madrid to Paris, in a year. Platforms like TikTok, emitting 50 million metric tonnes CO₂e per year globally, are estimated to produce a footprint larger than the annual emissions of entire countries, like Greece, simply due to keeping servers running 24/7 and delivering content to billions of users. (Tiktok’s Annual Carbon Footprint - The Guardian)
“If the emissions from our everyday digital habits — scrolling, streaming, uploading — carry such weight, why do they remain unnoticed by the common public eye?”
The answer is visibility. While these emissions can rival the carbon cost of short-haul flights we would normally think twice about taking, they leave no traces for our eyes to follow unlike the flights leaving contrails in the sky. They sit tight, powering our screens while overheating the planet in silence.
Although invisible, these emissions are most visible in the world of digital and graphic design. Because designing isn’t just about aesthetics — it also shapes how much energy a digital experience consumes. Heavy images and large video files, for example, require more data to load and more electricity from servers every time someone visits a page, increasing carbon emissions; one sustainable redesign of a university website—by simply optimizing image sizes across its pages—reduced emissions by around 25 tonnes of CO₂ per year (University of Edinburgh – EdWeb2 Sustainability Update).

Likewise, autoplay videos and complex animations make devices and servers work harder, whereas disabling autoplay and using static thumbnails significantly reduces unnecessary data transfer and energy use (Sustainable Web Design – Video & Animation). Choosing modern, compressed image formats like WebP or AVIF, and lazy-loading media only when it appears on screen, can further cut page weight and emissions (Google Web.dev – Image Optimization). Even font choices matter: lighter, system fonts load faster and consume less energy than heavy custom font files that must be downloaded each time a page loads (Wholegrain Digital – Sustainable Typography).

Small tweaks like these, when applied across millions of website visits and design interactions, can meaningfully lower the digital carbon footprint of design work. Hence, let’s not forget that as we design the world’s interface, we are also shaping its environmental footprint.



